Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Cobley 2017 Redox Biol

From Bioblast
Revision as of 11:22, 6 June 2021 by Komlodi Timea (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Publication |title=Cobley JN, Close GL, Bailey DM, Davison GW (2017) Exercise redox biochemistry: Conceptual, methodological and technical recommendations. Redox Biol 12:540...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)
Publications in the MiPMap
Cobley JN, Close GL, Bailey DM, Davison GW (2017) Exercise redox biochemistry: Conceptual, methodological and technical recommendations. Redox Biol 12:540-548.

Β» PMID:28371751 Open Access

Cobley JN, Close GL, Bailey DM, Davison GW (2017) Redox Biol

Abstract: Exercise redox biochemistry is of considerable interest owing to its translational value in health and disease. However, unaddressed conceptual, methodological and technical issues complicate attempts to unravel how exercise alters redox homeostasis in health and disease. Conceptual issues relate to misunderstandings that arise when the chemical heterogeneity of redox biology is disregarded: which often complicates attempts to use redox-active compounds and assess redox signalling. Further, that oxidised macromolecule adduct levels reflect formation and repair is seldom considered. Methodological and technical issues relate to the use of out-dated assays and/or inappropriate sample preparation techniques that confound biochemical redox analysis. After considering each of the aforementioned issues, we outline how each issue can be resolved and provide a unifying set of recommendations. We specifically recommend that investigators: consider chemical heterogeneity, use redox-active compounds judiciously, abandon flawed assays, carefully prepare samples and assay buffers, consider repair/metabolism, use multiple biomarkers to assess oxidative damage and redox signalling.


Labels:






MitoFit 2021 AmR