Difference between revisions of "Protonmotive force"

From Bioblast
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|description=The '''protonmotive force''', ∆<sub>m</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub>, is known as Δ''p'' in Peter Mitchell’s chemiosmotic theory [1], which establishes the link between electric and chemical components of energy transformation and coupling in [[oxidative phosphorylation]]. The unifying concept of the ''pmF'' ranks among the most fundamental theories in biology. As such, it provides the framework for developing a consistent theory and nomenclature for mitochondrial physiology and bioenergetics. The protonmotive force is not a vector force as defined in physics. This conflict is resolved by the generalized formulation of isomorphic, compartmental [[force]]s, ∆<sub>tr</sub>''F'', in energy (exergy) transformations [2]. Protonmotive means that there is a potential for the movement of protons, and force is a measure of the potential for motion.
 
|description=The '''protonmotive force''', ∆<sub>m</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub>, is known as Δ''p'' in Peter Mitchell’s chemiosmotic theory [1], which establishes the link between electric and chemical components of energy transformation and coupling in [[oxidative phosphorylation]]. The unifying concept of the ''pmF'' ranks among the most fundamental theories in biology. As such, it provides the framework for developing a consistent theory and nomenclature for mitochondrial physiology and bioenergetics. The protonmotive force is not a vector force as defined in physics. This conflict is resolved by the generalized formulation of isomorphic, compartmental [[force]]s, ∆<sub>tr</sub>''F'', in energy (exergy) transformations [2]. Protonmotive means that there is a potential for the movement of protons, and force is a measure of the potential for motion.
  
The ''pmF'' is generated in [[oxidative phosphorylation]] by oxidation of reduced fuel substrates and reduction of O<sub>2</sub> to H<sub>2</sub>O, driving the coupled proton translocation from the mt-matrix space across the mitochondrial inner membrane (mtIM) through the proton pumps of the [[electron transfer system]] (ETS), which are known as respiratory Complexes CI, CIII and CIV. ∆<sub>m</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub> consists of two partial isomorphic forces: (''1'') The electric part, ∆<sub>el</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub> (corresponding to ∆''Ψ'')<sup>§</sup>, is the electric potential difference<sup>§</sup>, which is not specific for H<sup>+</sup> and can, therefore, be measured by the distribution of any permeable cation equilibrating between the negative (matrix) and positive (external) compartment. (''2'') The chemical part, ∆<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub>, relates to the diffusion (d) of uncharged particles and contains the chemical potential difference<sup>§</sup> in H+, ∆''µ''<sub>H+</sub>, which is proportional to the pH difference, ∆pH. Motion is relative and not absolute (Principle of Galilean Relativity); likewise there is no absolute potential, but isomorphic forces are stoichiometric potential differences<sup>§</sup>.
+
The ''pmF'' is generated in [[oxidative phosphorylation]] by oxidation of reduced fuel substrates and reduction of O<sub>2</sub> to H<sub>2</sub>O, driving the coupled proton translocation from the mt-matrix space across the mitochondrial inner membrane (mtIM) through the proton pumps of the [[electron transfer system]] (ETS), which are known as respiratory Complexes CI, CIII and CIV. ∆<sub>m</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub> consists of two partial isomorphic forces: (''1'') The electric part, ∆<sub>el</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub> (corresponding numerically to ∆''Ψ'')<sup>§</sup>, is the electric potential difference<sup>§</sup>, which is not specific for H<sup>+</sup> and can, therefore, be measured by the distribution of any permeable cation equilibrating between the negative (matrix) and positive (external) compartment. (''2'') The chemical part, ∆<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub>, relates to the diffusion (d) of uncharged particles and contains the chemical potential difference<sup>§</sup> in H+, ∆''µ''<sub>H+</sub>, which is proportional to the pH difference, ∆pH. Motion is relative and not absolute (Principle of Galilean Relativity); likewise there is no absolute potential, but isomorphic forces are stoichiometric potential differences<sup>§</sup>.
  
 
The total motive force (motive = electric + chemical) is distinguished from the partial components by subscript ‘m’, ∆<sub>m</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub>. Reading this symbol by starting with the proton, it can be seen as ''pmF'', or the subscript m (motive) can be remembered by the name of Mitchell,
 
The total motive force (motive = electric + chemical) is distinguished from the partial components by subscript ‘m’, ∆<sub>m</sub>''F''<sub>H+</sub>. Reading this symbol by starting with the proton, it can be seen as ''pmF'', or the subscript m (motive) can be remembered by the name of Mitchell,
Line 16: Line 16:
 
|info=[[Mitchell 2011 Biochim Biophys Acta]], [[Gnaiger 2019 MitoPathways]]
 
|info=[[Mitchell 2011 Biochim Biophys Acta]], [[Gnaiger 2019 MitoPathways]]
 
}}
 
}}
  Communicated by [[Gnaiger E]] 2018-10-15 (last update 2019-06-16)
+
  Communicated by [[Gnaiger E]] last update 2019-06-16; 2018-10-15
  
 
{{Keywords Force and membrane potential}}
 
{{Keywords Force and membrane potential}}
Line 39: Line 39:
 
:::# Mitchell P (1966) Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Glynn Research, Bodmin. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1807:1507-38. - [[Mitchell 2011 Biochim Biophys Acta |»Bioblast link«]]
 
:::# Mitchell P (1966) Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Glynn Research, Bodmin. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1807:1507-38. - [[Mitchell 2011 Biochim Biophys Acta |»Bioblast link«]]
 
:::# Gnaiger E (1993) Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of energy transformations. Pure Appl Chem 65:1983-2002. - [[Gnaiger_1993_Pure_Appl_Chem |»Bioblast link«]]
 
:::# Gnaiger E (1993) Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of energy transformations. Pure Appl Chem 65:1983-2002. - [[Gnaiger_1993_Pure_Appl_Chem |»Bioblast link«]]
 +
:::# Gnaiger E (2019) Mitochondrial pathways and respiratory control. An introduction to OXPHOS analysis. 5th ed. Mitochondr Physiol Network 24.05. Oroboros MiPNet Publications, Innsbruck:96 pp. - [[Gnaiger 2019 MitoPathways |»Bioblast link«]]
  
 
{{MitoPedia concepts
 
{{MitoPedia concepts
 
|mitopedia concept=MiP concept, Ergodynamics
 
|mitopedia concept=MiP concept, Ergodynamics
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:51, 8 August 2019

Bioblasts - Richard Altmann and MiPArt by Odra Noel
MitoPedia         Terms and abbreviations         Concepts and methods         MitoPedia: SUIT         MiP and biochemistry         Preprints and history



MitoPedia

Protonmotive force

Description

The protonmotive force, ∆mFH+, is known as Δp in Peter Mitchell’s chemiosmotic theory [1], which establishes the link between electric and chemical components of energy transformation and coupling in oxidative phosphorylation. The unifying concept of the pmF ranks among the most fundamental theories in biology. As such, it provides the framework for developing a consistent theory and nomenclature for mitochondrial physiology and bioenergetics. The protonmotive force is not a vector force as defined in physics. This conflict is resolved by the generalized formulation of isomorphic, compartmental forces, ∆trF, in energy (exergy) transformations [2]. Protonmotive means that there is a potential for the movement of protons, and force is a measure of the potential for motion.

The pmF is generated in oxidative phosphorylation by oxidation of reduced fuel substrates and reduction of O2 to H2O, driving the coupled proton translocation from the mt-matrix space across the mitochondrial inner membrane (mtIM) through the proton pumps of the electron transfer system (ETS), which are known as respiratory Complexes CI, CIII and CIV. ∆mFH+ consists of two partial isomorphic forces: (1) The electric part, ∆elFH+ (corresponding numerically to ∆Ψ)§, is the electric potential difference§, which is not specific for H+ and can, therefore, be measured by the distribution of any permeable cation equilibrating between the negative (matrix) and positive (external) compartment. (2) The chemical part, ∆dFH+, relates to the diffusion (d) of uncharged particles and contains the chemical potential difference§ in H+, ∆µH+, which is proportional to the pH difference, ∆pH. Motion is relative and not absolute (Principle of Galilean Relativity); likewise there is no absolute potential, but isomorphic forces are stoichiometric potential differences§.

The total motive force (motive = electric + chemical) is distinguished from the partial components by subscript ‘m’, ∆mFH+. Reading this symbol by starting with the proton, it can be seen as pmF, or the subscript m (motive) can be remembered by the name of Mitchell,

mFH+ = ∆elFH+ + ∆dFH+

With classical symbols, this equation contains the Faraday constant, F, multiplied implicitly by the charge number of the proton (zH+ = 1), and has the form [1]

p = ∆Ψ + ∆µH+F-1

A partial electric force of 0.2 V in the electrical format, ∆elFeH+pos, is 19 kJ∙mol­-1 H+pos in the molar format, ∆elFnH+pos. For 1 unit of ∆pH, the partial chemical force changes by -5.9 kJ∙mol­-1 in the molar format, ∆dFnH+pos, and by ­0.06 V in the electrical format, ∆dFeH+pos. Considering a driving force of -470 kJ∙mol-1 O2 for oxidation, the thermodynamic limit of the H+pos/O2 ratio is reached at a value of 470/19 = 24, compared to the mechanistic stoichiometry of 20 for the N-pathway with three coupling sites.

Abbreviation: pmF, ∆mFH+, Δp [J·MU-1]

Reference: Mitchell 2011 Biochim Biophys Acta, Gnaiger 2019 MitoPathways

Communicated by Gnaiger E last update 2019-06-16; 2018-10-15


Questions.jpg


Click to expand or collaps
» Keywords: Force and membrane potential
Fundamental relationships
» Force
» Affinity
» Flux
» Advancement
» Advancement per volume
» Stoichiometric number
mt-Membrane potential and protonmotive force
» Protonmotive force
» Mitochondrial membrane potential
» Chemical potential
» Faraday constant
» Format
» Uncoupler
O2k-Potentiometry
» O2k-Catalogue: O2k-TPP+ ISE-Module
» O2k-Manual: MiPNet15.03 O2k-MultiSensor-ISE
» TPP - O2k-Procedures: Tetraphenylphosphonium
» Specifications: MiPNet15.08 TPP electrode
» Poster
» Unspecific binding of TPP+
» TPP+ inhibitory effect
O2k-Fluorometry
» O2k-Catalogue: O2k-FluoRespirometer
» O2k-Manual: MiPNet22.11 O2k-FluoRespirometer manual
» Safranin - O2k-Procedures: MiPNet20.13 Safranin mt-membranepotential / Safranin
» TMRM - O2k-Procedures: TMRM
O2k-Publications
» O2k-Publications: mt-Membrane potential
» O2k-Publications: Coupling efficiency;uncoupling

Notes:

1: The sign of the flux, JmH+, depends on the definition of the compartmental direction of the translocation. Flux in the outward direction into the positively (pos) charged compartment, JmH+pos, is positive when H+pos is added to the pos-compartment (the stoichiometric number is νH+pos = 1), and H+neg is removed stoichiometrically (νH+neg = -1). Conversely, JmH+neg is positive when H+neg is added to the negatively charged compartment (νH+neg = 1) and H+pos is removed (νH+pos = -1).

2: ∆mFH+ is the protonmotive force per entity H+ (not per e-) expressed in any MU-format. ∆elFH+ is the partial protonmotive force (el) acting generally on charged motive elements (i.e., ions that are permeable across the mtIM). In contrast, ∆dFH+ is the partial protonmotive force specific for proton diffusion (d) irrespective of charge. The sign of the force is negative for exergonic transformations in which exergy is lost or dissipated, ∆mFH+neg, and positive for endergonic transformations which conserve exergy in a coupled exergonic process, ∆mFH+pos = -∆mFH+neg. By definition, the product of flux and force is volume-specific power [J∙s­-1∙m-3 = W∙m­-3]: PV,mH+ = JmeH+pos∙∆mFeH+pos = JmnH+pos∙∆mFnH+pos.

3: 3n and 3e are the classical representations of 2n (∆dFnH+ ≡ ∆μH+)§ and 2e (∆elFeH+ ≡ ∆Ψz)§; z = zH+ = 1.

Footnote

§ Superscript ‘§’ indicates throughout the text those terms, where potential differences provide a mathematically correct but physicochemically incomplete description and should be replaced by stoichiometric potential differences [2]. Appreciation of the fundamental distinction between differences of potential versus differences of stoichiometric potential may be considered a key to critically evaluate the definitions of the protonmotive force.


References

  1. Mitchell P (1966) Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Glynn Research, Bodmin. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1807:1507-38. - »Bioblast link«
  2. Gnaiger E (1993) Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of energy transformations. Pure Appl Chem 65:1983-2002. - »Bioblast link«
  3. Gnaiger E (2019) Mitochondrial pathways and respiratory control. An introduction to OXPHOS analysis. 5th ed. Mitochondr Physiol Network 24.05. Oroboros MiPNet Publications, Innsbruck:96 pp. - »Bioblast link«


MitoPedia concepts: MiP concept, Ergodynamics