Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bioblast 2022"

From Bioblast
Line 6: Line 6:
ย  [[Gnaiger Erich]] 2022-06-16
ย  [[Gnaiger Erich]] 2022-06-16


::::* The lockdown phase was a bad timing for starting BEC, since it separated us by preventing real life meetings from happening. Bioblast 2022 is a re-start: We will discuss the future of BEC.
::::* The lockdown phase was a bad timing for starting BEC, since it separated us by preventing real life meetings from happening. [[Bioblast 2022]] is a re-start: We will discuss the future of BEC.


::::* Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? โ€” Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join [[DORA]].
::::* Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? โ€” Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join [[DORA]].

Revision as of 21:51, 16 June 2022

Discussion: The future of BEC

A discussion on publishing

Gnaiger Erich 2022-06-16
  • The lockdown phase was a bad timing for starting BEC, since it separated us by preventing real life meetings from happening. Bioblast 2022 is a re-start: We will discuss the future of BEC.
  • Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? โ€” Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join DORA.
  • โ€˜Open Accessโ€™ at a publication charge of $ 4620? Does the publication charge make a good journal? The paywall business model would collapse, when scientists refuse to do the journalism jobs in the financial interest of paywall journals.

Keywords selected from MitoPedia: BEC

ยป MitoPedia: BEC

BEC - beyond counting papers