Difference between revisions of "Warburg effect"

From Bioblast
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
== From the literature ==
 
== From the literature ==
::::* Warburg O (1956) On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123:309–14.
+
:::* [[Fang 2010 Cell|Fang M, Shen Z, Huang S, Zhao L, Chen S, Mak TW, Wang X (2010) The ER UDPase ENTPD5 promotes protein N-glycosylation, the Warburg effect, and proliferation in the PTEN pathway. Cell 143:711-24]].  
::::* Warburg O (1956) On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124:269-70.
+
:::: Warburg effect: "elevation of aerobic glycolysis seen in tumor cells"; "elevated lactate production under aerobic conditions".
::::* Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029-33.
+
 
 +
:::* Ferreira LM (2010) Cancer metabolism: the Warburg effect today. Exp Mol Pathol 89:372-80. [PMID: 20804748]
 +
 
 +
:::* Kim JW, Dang CV (2006) Cancer’s molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res 66:8927-30.  
 +
 
 +
:::* Liberti MV, Locasale JW (2016) The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci 41:211–8. [PubMed: 26778478]
  
::::* [[Fang 2010 Cell|Fang M, Shen Z, Huang S, Zhao L, Chen S, Mak TW, Wang X (2010) The ER UDPase ENTPD5 promotes protein N-glycosylation, the Warburg effect, and proliferation in the PTEN pathway. Cell 143:711-24]].
+
:::* [[Van Beek MiP2010 |van Beek JHGM (2010) Computational model predictions of metabolic fluxes connecting cytosol and mitochondrial matrix under ‘Warburg effect’ conditions. Mitochondr Physiol Network 15.06:80.]]
:::: Warburg effect: "elevation of aerobic glycolysis seen in tumor cells"; "elevated lactate production under aerobic conditions".
+
 
 +
:::* [[Vaupel MiP2010 |Vaupel P, Mayer A (2010) Evidence against a mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer cells as a hallmark of malignant growth. Mitochondr Physiol Network 15.06:79.]]
  
::::* Kim JW, Dang CV (2006) Cancer’s molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res 66:8927-30.  
+
:::* Van der Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029-33.
  
::::* [[Vaupel MiP2010 |Vaupel P, Mayer A (2010) Evidence against a mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer cells as a hallmark of malignant growth. Mitochondr Physiol Network 15.06:79.]]
+
:::* Warburg O (1956) On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123:309–14.
  
::::* [[Van Beek MiP2010 |van Beek JHGM (2010) Computational model predictions of metabolic fluxes connecting cytosol and mitochondrial matrix under ‘Warburg effect’ conditions. Mitochondr Physiol Network 15.06:80.]]
+
:::* Warburg O (1956) On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124:269-70.

Latest revision as of 13:52, 7 November 2019

Bioblasts - Richard Altmann and MiPArt by Odra Noel
MitoPedia         Terms and abbreviations         Concepts and methods         MitoPedia: SUIT         MiP and biochemistry         Preprints and history



MitoPedia

Warburg effect

Description

Requires definition


Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_effect


MitoPedia methods: Respirometry 



Oxygen and pH - Warburg versus Crabtree Effect

Q: For quantification of aerobic glycolysis in intact cells, the measurement of proton production can be used as an indirect but continuous record of lactate production and corresponding acidification of the medium, while simultaneously monitoring oxygen concentration and oxygen consumption (MultiSensor-O2k). Is this related to the Warburg or Crabtree effect?
A: Under various metabolic conditions, lactic acid production is the dominant mechanism causing acidification, hence the pH measurement is a good indirect indicator of aerobic glycolysis. An early paper summarizing the literature in this field states:
"At high fructose concen­trations, respiration is inhibited while glycolytic end products accumulate, a phenomenon known as the Crabtree effect. It is commonly believed that this effect is restric­ted to microbial and tumour cells with uniquely high glycolytic capaci­ties (Sussman et al, 1980). How­ever, inhibition of respiration and increase of lactate production are observed under aerobic condi­tions in beating rat heart cell cultures (Frelin et al, 1974) and in isolated rat lung cells (Ayuso-Parrilla et al, 1978). Thus, the same general mechanisms respon­sible for the integra­tion of respiration and glycolysis in tumour cells (Sussman et al, 1980) appear to be operating to some extent in several isolated mammalian cells." Gnaiger 1990 Biochim Biophys Acta


From the literature

Warburg effect: "elevation of aerobic glycolysis seen in tumor cells"; "elevated lactate production under aerobic conditions".
  • Ferreira LM (2010) Cancer metabolism: the Warburg effect today. Exp Mol Pathol 89:372-80. [PMID: 20804748]
  • Kim JW, Dang CV (2006) Cancer’s molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res 66:8927-30.
  • Liberti MV, Locasale JW (2016) The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci 41:211–8. [PubMed: 26778478]
  • Van der Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029-33.
  • Warburg O (1956) On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123:309–14.
  • Warburg O (1956) On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124:269-70.