Difference between revisions of "Warburg effect"
From Bioblast
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== From the literature == | == From the literature == | ||
:::* [[Fang 2010 Cell|Fang M, Shen Z, Huang S, Zhao L, Chen S, Mak TW, Wang X (2010) The ER UDPase ENTPD5 promotes protein N-glycosylation, the Warburg effect, and proliferation in the PTEN pathway. Cell 143:711-24]]. Â | |||
:::: Warburg effect: "elevation of aerobic glycolysis seen in tumor cells"; "elevated lactate production under aerobic conditions". | |||
:::: | |||
:::* Ferreira LM (2010) Cancer metabolism: the Warburg effect today. Exp Mol Pathol 89:372-80. [PMID: 20804748] | |||
::: | Â | ||
:::* Kim JW, Dang CV (2006) Cancerâs molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res 66:8927-30. Â | |||
 | |||
:::* Liberti MV, Locasale JW (2016) The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci 41:211â8. [PubMed: 26778478] | |||
 | |||
:::* [[Van Beek MiP2010 |van Beek JHGM (2010) Computational model predictions of metabolic fluxes connecting cytosol and mitochondrial matrix under âWarburg effectâ conditions. Mitochondr Physiol Network 15.06:80.]] | |||
:::* [[Vaupel MiP2010 |Vaupel P, Mayer A (2010) Evidence against a mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer cells as a hallmark of malignant growth. Mitochondr Physiol Network 15.06:79.]] | |||
:::* Van der Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029-33. | |||
:::* Warburg O (1956) On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123:309â14. | |||
:::* Warburg O (1956) On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124:269-70. |
Revision as of 13:52, 7 November 2019
Description
Requires definition
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_effect
MitoPedia methods:
Respirometry
Oxygen and pH - Warburg versus Crabtree Effect
- Q: For quantification of aerobic glycolysis in intact cells, the measurement of proton production can be used as an indirect but continuous record of lactate production and corresponding acidification of the medium, while simultaneously monitoring oxygen concentration and oxygen consumption (MultiSensor-O2k). Is this related to the Warburg or Crabtree effect?
- A: Under various metabolic conditions, lactic acid production is the dominant mechanism causing acidification, hence the pH measurement is a good indirect indicator of aerobic glycolysis. An early paper summarizing the literature in this field states:
- "At high fructose concenÂtrations, respiration is inhibited while glycolytic end products accumulate, a phenomenon known as the Crabtree effect. It is commonly believed that this effect is restricÂted to microbial and tumour cells with uniquely high glycolytic capaciÂties (Sussman et al, 1980). HowÂever, inhibition of respiration and increase of lactate production are observed under aerobic condiÂtions in beating rat heart cell cultures (Frelin et al, 1974) and in isolated rat lung cells (Ayuso-Parrilla et al, 1978). Thus, the same general mechanisms responÂsible for the integraÂtion of respiration and glycolysis in tumour cells (Sussman et al, 1980) appear to be operating to some extent in several isolated mammalian cells." Gnaiger 1990 Biochim Biophys Acta
From the literature
-
- Warburg effect: "elevation of aerobic glycolysis seen in tumor cells"; "elevated lactate production under aerobic conditions".
-
- Ferreira LM (2010) Cancer metabolism: the Warburg effect today. Exp Mol Pathol 89:372-80. [PMID: 20804748]
- Kim JW, Dang CV (2006) Cancerâs molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res 66:8927-30.
- Liberti MV, Locasale JW (2016) The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci 41:211â8. [PubMed: 26778478]
- Van der Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029-33.
- Warburg O (1956) On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123:309â14.
- Warburg O (1956) On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124:269-70.