Difference between revisions of "Baker 2016b Nature"
From Bioblast
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Baker M (2016) How quality control could save your science. Nature 529:456–458. | |title=Baker M (2016) How quality control could save your science. Nature 529:456–458. | ||
|info=[https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.19223!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/529456a.pdf Open Access] | |info=[https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.19223!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/529456a.pdf PMID:26819028 Open Access] | ||
|authors=Baker M | |authors=Baker M | ||
|year=2016 | |year=2016 | ||
|journal=Nature | |journal=Nature | ||
|abstract=It may not be sexy, but quality assurance is becoming a crucial part of lab life | |abstract=It may not be sexy, but quality assurance is becoming a crucial part of lab life. | ||
<small> © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved </small> | <small> © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved </small> | ||
}} | |||
{{Labeling | {{Labeling | ||
|additional= | |additional=QM | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 12:03, 12 March 2024
Baker M (2016) How quality control could save your science. Nature 529:456–458. |
Abstract: It may not be sexy, but quality assurance is becoming a crucial part of lab life.
© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Labels:
QM