Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amplex UltraRed"

From Bioblast
Line 129: Line 129:




As a starting point for the development of our own application protocols (see [[Krumschnabel 2014 Methods Mol Biol]], [[MiPNet19.20_Amplex_Red_Data_Acquisition_and_Analysis| MiPNet19.20]]) we at Oroboros Instruments used two publications from [[HU Budapest Tretter L|Prof. Tretters OROBOROS MiPNet Reference Laboratory]] as a starting point for our development: [[Tretter 2012 Free Radic Biol Med]] and [[Komary 2010 Biochim Biophys Acta]].
As a starting point for the development of our own application protocols ([[Krumschnabel 2015 Methods Mol Biol]], [[MiPNet19.20_Amplex_Red_Data_Acquisition_and_Analysis| MiPNet19.20]]) the OROBOROS-Team referred to two publications from [[HU Budapest Tretter L|Prof. Lazlo Tretter's O2k-Network Laboratory]] as a starting point for our development:  
* [[Tretter 2012 Free Radic Biol Med]]
* [[Komary 2010 Biochim Biophys Acta]].


== Media ==
== Media ==


see [[Krumschnabel 2014 Methods Mol Biol]].
See [[Krumschnabel 2015 Methods Mol Biol]].


Media that were designed to have some antioxidant properties will  frequently consume H2O2 before it can react with Amplex (R) (Ultra)Red  to form the active fluorophore resorufin. This can be shown by comparing   
Media with high antioxidant activity compete with HRP and partially consume H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> before it can react with Amplex (R) (Ultra)Red  to form the active fluorophore resorufin. This was shown by comparing   
* the sensitivity as determined by H2O2 additions to different media containing HRP and Amplex (R) UltraRed  
* the sensitivity as determined by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> additions to different media containing HRP and Amplex (R) UltraRed;
* the sensitivity as determined by addition of the actual fluorophore resorufin to the same media (signal change per added resorufin)
* the sensitivity as determined by addition of the actual fluorophore resorufin to the same media (signal change per added resorufin); the sensitivity is signal change per added H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> or resorufin.


(Sensitivity is signal change per added H2O2 or resorufin.)
The sensitivity, as determined by addition of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, is much higher in a simple phosphate buffer compared to media with strong antioxidant capacity. In contrast, this is not the case for the sensitivity with respect to resorufin.


While  the sensitivity measured by the addition of H2O2 drops drastically from  a simple phosphate buffer to media with strong antioxidant properties, this is not observed when the sensitivity is determined by the addition  of resorufin.
A chemical background drift, which is always observed for the Amplex /HRP system, is independent of the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> sensitivity versus the same (absolute) drift expressed as (calibrated)  "apparent H2O2 production" will be higher in a medium with low H2O2  sensitivity as compared to a medium with high H2O2 sensitivity.
 
Since the non biological drift always observed for the Amplex /HRP system is independent of the sensitivity versus H2O2 the same (absolute) drift expressed as (calibrated)  "apparent H2O2 production" will be higher in a medium with low H2O2  sensitivity as compared to a medium with high H2O2 sensitivity.


As  expected some traditional KCl based media, similar to those used in  ... showed a far higher sensitivity against H2O2 addition than MiR05, while some experiments indicated a lower respiration.
As  expected some traditional KCl based media, similar to those used in  ... showed a far higher sensitivity against H2O2 addition than MiR05, while some experiments indicated a lower respiration.
Line 149: Line 149:
=== Comparison MiR05Cr to MiRK03Cr ===
=== Comparison MiR05Cr to MiRK03Cr ===


'''Conditions:'''
'''Instrumental settings'''  
''Instrumental settings:''  
* Amp. Gain 1000  
*Amp.Gain 1000  
* Light intesity variable: 1 mA, 2 mA and 5 mA
*Light intesity variable 1mA, 2mA and 5mA
* Configuration O2k-Fluo sensor always the same: O2k P1: Sensors B-0111/B-0082; O2k P2: Sensors B-0119/B-0117; O2k P3: Sensors A-0004/B-0112; O2k P4: Sensors A-0087/A-0088.
*Configuration O2K -Sensor always the same: Oxygraph AB: Sensors B-0111/B-0082 Oxygraph CD: Sensors B-0119/B-0117 Oxygraph EF: Sensors A-0004/B-0112 Oxygraph GH: Sensors A-0087/A-0088  
''Media:''
[[MiR05Cr]] and
 
MiRK03Cr:
 
KCl 130 mM, 
HEPES free acid 20 mM,
KH2PO4 10 mM, 
MgCl2 3 mM,
EGTA 0.5 mM, 
BSA : 0.1%, 
pH=7, 
add 120 mg Creatine to 40 ml buffer
 
'''Attention''': After thawing MiRK03 a preciptation was observed.After 20 minutes shaking precipitate was dissolved.  
   
   
'''Titration:'''
'''Media'''  
* [[MiR05Cr]]
* MiRK03Cr: KCl 130 mM, HEPES free acid 20 mM, KH2PO4 10 mM, MgCl2 3 mM, EGTA 0.5 mM, BSA 0.1%, pH=7, add 120 mg Creatine to 40 ml buffer. After thawing MiRK03 a preciptate was observed, which was dissolved after 20 min shaking.
   
   
10 µl Amplex UltraRed (conc:1 mM -> 5 µMl in chamber)  
'''Titrations'''
4µl HRP (conc:500 U/ml -> 1 U/ml in chamber)
* 10 µl Amplex UltraRed (stock: 1 mM -> 5 µM final in chamber)  
2*10 µl of 56,32 µM H2O2 solution  
* 4 µl HRP (stock: 500 U/ml -> 1 U/ml final in chamber)
* 2*10 µl of 56,32 µM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> solution  
   
   
'''Results/Figures:'''  
'''Results/Figures'''  


'''Drift vs Sensitivity:'''
'''Drift vs Sensitivity:'''
 
* See [[Krumschnabel 2015 Methods Mol Biol]].
[[Image:Drift vs sensitivity.png|600px]]
[[Image:Drift vs sensitivity.png|600px]]


Line 209: Line 196:
'''Evaluation of  respirometry in MiR05Cr versus MiRK03Cr (N=2):'''
'''Evaluation of  respirometry in MiR05Cr versus MiRK03Cr (N=2):'''


'''Titration:'''
'''Titrations'''
* 10 µl Amplex UltraRed (stock: 1 mM -> 5 µM final in chamber)  
10 µl Amplex UltraRed (conc:1 mM -> 5 µM in chamber)  
* 4 µl HRP (stock: 500 U/ml -> 1 U/ml final in chamber)
4µl HRP (conc:500 U/ml -> 1 U/ml in chamber)
* 2*5 µl of 28.16 µM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> solution : 0 µM, 0.07040 µM, 0.1406 µM
2*5 µl of 28.16 µM H2O2 solution : 0 µM, 0.07040 µM, 0.1406 µM


[[File:O2_Flux_per_mass_MiR05Cr_vs_MiRK03Cr.png]]
[[File:O2_Flux_per_mass_MiR05Cr_vs_MiRK03Cr.png]]
Line 220: Line 206:
Fig.16 and 17
Fig.16 and 17


To do:? with switched chambers with and without Creatine in low light intensity




Line 232: Line 217:
== Popular Bioblast page ==
== Popular Bioblast page ==
[[Amplex red]] has been accessed more than
[[Amplex red]] has been accessed more than
:* 10,000 times (2015-04-27)
:*  5,000 times (2014-05-29)
:*  5,000 times (2014-05-29)

Revision as of 07:31, 27 April 2015

Different Brands

Trade Mark Manufacturer/ Distributor
price [€/mg]
product id
Amplex Red
Invitrogen
37.4
A12222
Amplex Ultra Red
Invitrogen
48.8
A36006
Ampliflu Red
Sigma
18.5
90101
Quanta Red
Thermo scientific
15150

Conditions

Citation Amplex HRP pH Limit of detection
stock final unit definition stock final
mM
µM
U/ml
U/ml
BIOTEK
10
50
pyrogallol
10
0.1
7.4
4 nM (absorption 300 nm)
INVITROGEN
10
50
10
0.1
6 to 7.5
<80 nM
Towne 2004
160
0.41
7.5 to 8.5
100 nM
Zhou1997
3 ?
0.3 to 1
50 nM (10 nM optimal)
Mohanty1997
100
10 to 100
1
18 nM
Komary2010
1
2.5


As a starting point for the development of our own application protocols (Krumschnabel 2015 Methods Mol Biol, MiPNet19.20) the OROBOROS-Team referred to two publications from Prof. Lazlo Tretter's O2k-Network Laboratory as a starting point for our development:

Media

See Krumschnabel 2015 Methods Mol Biol.

Media with high antioxidant activity compete with HRP and partially consume H2O2 before it can react with Amplex (R) (Ultra)Red to form the active fluorophore resorufin. This was shown by comparing

  • the sensitivity as determined by H2O2 additions to different media containing HRP and Amplex (R) UltraRed;
  • the sensitivity as determined by addition of the actual fluorophore resorufin to the same media (signal change per added resorufin); the sensitivity is signal change per added H2O2 or resorufin.

The sensitivity, as determined by addition of H2O2, is much higher in a simple phosphate buffer compared to media with strong antioxidant capacity. In contrast, this is not the case for the sensitivity with respect to resorufin.

A chemical background drift, which is always observed for the Amplex /HRP system, is independent of the H2O2 sensitivity versus the same (absolute) drift expressed as (calibrated) "apparent H2O2 production" will be higher in a medium with low H2O2 sensitivity as compared to a medium with high H2O2 sensitivity.

As expected some traditional KCl based media, similar to those used in ... showed a far higher sensitivity against H2O2 addition than MiR05, while some experiments indicated a lower respiration.

Comparison MiR05Cr to MiRK03Cr

Instrumental settings

  • Amp. Gain 1000
  • Light intesity variable: 1 mA, 2 mA and 5 mA
  • Configuration O2k-Fluo sensor always the same: O2k P1: Sensors B-0111/B-0082; O2k P2: Sensors B-0119/B-0117; O2k P3: Sensors A-0004/B-0112; O2k P4: Sensors A-0087/A-0088.

Media

  • MiR05Cr
  • MiRK03Cr: KCl 130 mM, HEPES free acid 20 mM, KH2PO4 10 mM, MgCl2 3 mM, EGTA 0.5 mM, BSA 0.1%, pH=7, add 120 mg Creatine to 40 ml buffer. After thawing MiRK03 a preciptate was observed, which was dissolved after 20 min shaking.

Titrations

  • 10 µl Amplex UltraRed (stock: 1 mM -> 5 µM final in chamber)
  • 4 µl HRP (stock: 500 U/ml -> 1 U/ml final in chamber)
  • 2*10 µl of 56,32 µM H2O2 solution

Results/Figures

Drift vs Sensitivity:

Drift vs sensitivity.png

Fig.6

SD drift at diff. H2O2 conc.png

Fig.7


--> Drift and sensitivity at least as good as MitoOx2 (=MiRK02)


Drift vs light intensity

Light int. vs. calib.drift in MiR05Cr.png Light int. vs.calib. drift in MiRK03Cr.png

Fig.14 and Fig. 15


--> MirK03, MiR05: drift not dependent on light intensity ( 1 to 5 mA)

compare to "MitoOx2":

Drift vs light MitoOx2.png

Evaluation of respirometry in MiR05Cr versus MiRK03Cr (N=2):

Titrations

  • 10 µl Amplex UltraRed (stock: 1 mM -> 5 µM final in chamber)
  • 4 µl HRP (stock: 500 U/ml -> 1 U/ml final in chamber)
  • 2*5 µl of 28.16 µM H2O2 solution : 0 µM, 0.07040 µM, 0.1406 µM

O2 Flux per mass MiR05Cr vs MiRK03Cr.png Flux Control Ratio MiR05Cr vs MiRK03Cr.png

Fig.16 and 17


Drift signal ratios.png

Fontanam 16:22, 6 August 2013 (CEST)


Bioblast wiki

Popular Bioblast page

Amplex red has been accessed more than

  • 10,000 times (2015-04-27)
  • 5,000 times (2014-05-29)