Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Talk:MitoEAGLE Verona 2016"

From Bioblast
Line 1: Line 1:
== Topics for discussion ==
__TOC__


::::1. Next Management Committee Meeting in an Inclusiveness Target Country, Grant Period 2.
== Next Management Committee Meeting in an Inclusiveness Target Country, Grant Period 2 ==
::::::* Suggestion by Erich Gnaiger: (i) I suggest that we plan one MC Meeting per Grant Period. (ii) The MC Meeting should not be too late in the Grant Period, to take early decisions on next MITOEAGLE events and STSM. But it should neither be too close to the Barcelona MC Meeting in March 2017. Therefore, Nov 2017 might be optimum. (iii) The Czech Republic as an Inclusiveness Target Country might be considered for the Nov 2017 MC Meeting. This was raised in correspondence with [[Cervinkova Z |Zuzana Cervinkova]].
::::::* Suggestion by Erich Gnaiger: (i) I suggest that we plan one MC Meeting per Grant Period. (ii) The MC Meeting should not be too late in the Grant Period, to take early decisions on next MITOEAGLE events and STSM. But it should neither be too close to the Barcelona MC Meeting in March 2017. Therefore, Nov 2017 might be optimum. (iii) The Czech Republic as an Inclusiveness Target Country might be considered for the Nov 2017 MC Meeting. This was raised in correspondence with [[Cervinkova Z |Zuzana Cervinkova]].
== Dissemination plan ==
:::* [[Makrecka-Kuka M]] 2016-10-26 [[Media:Dissemination plan MITOEAGLE.docx |Dissemination plan MITOEAGLE.docx]] - [[File:Dissemination plan MITOEAGLE.docx]]
:::* [[Gnaiger E]] 2016-10-26
::::* www.mitoeagle.eu – I would strongly prefer www.mitoeagle.org, since the project has a global dimension beyond '''eu''', which is emphasized by the link to the Mitochondrial Physiology Society. However, perhaps you have in mind some specific advantages of β€šeuβ€˜?
::::* Password-protected section only accessible to the Action members – I do not consider this as a good option for a COST Action, with full emphasis on Open Accress. Where do you see a need for restricted access?Β 
::::* It will be important to break down the dissemination plan into phases coherent with the Grant Periods of our Action, such that the Budget Plans can be prepared according to realistic aims - with volunteers taking responsibility for completing the tasks. The budget for 'Financial and Scientific Administration and Coordination' allocated to the Grant Holder is entirely insufficient to fully administrate the dissemination plan.

Revision as of 08:26, 27 October 2016

Next Management Committee Meeting in an Inclusiveness Target Country, Grant Period 2

  • Suggestion by Erich Gnaiger: (i) I suggest that we plan one MC Meeting per Grant Period. (ii) The MC Meeting should not be too late in the Grant Period, to take early decisions on next MITOEAGLE events and STSM. But it should neither be too close to the Barcelona MC Meeting in March 2017. Therefore, Nov 2017 might be optimum. (iii) The Czech Republic as an Inclusiveness Target Country might be considered for the Nov 2017 MC Meeting. This was raised in correspondence with Zuzana Cervinkova.

Dissemination plan

  • www.mitoeagle.eu – I would strongly prefer www.mitoeagle.org, since the project has a global dimension beyond eu, which is emphasized by the link to the Mitochondrial Physiology Society. However, perhaps you have in mind some specific advantages of β€šeuβ€˜?
  • Password-protected section only accessible to the Action members – I do not consider this as a good option for a COST Action, with full emphasis on Open Accress. Where do you see a need for restricted access?
  • It will be important to break down the dissemination plan into phases coherent with the Grant Periods of our Action, such that the Budget Plans can be prepared according to realistic aims - with volunteers taking responsibility for completing the tasks. The budget for 'Financial and Scientific Administration and Coordination' allocated to the Grant Holder is entirely insufficient to fully administrate the dissemination plan.