Rodgers 2021 Elife

From Bioblast
Revision as of 17:11, 4 February 2022 by Gnaiger Erich (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)
Publications in the MiPMap
Rodgers P, Collings A (2021) What have we learned? Elife 10:e75830. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75830

Β» PMID: 34874010 Open Access

Rodgers P, Collings A (2021) Elife

Abstract: As the final outputs of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology are published, it is clear that preclinical research in cancer biology is not as reproducible as it should be.

β€’ Bioblast editor: Gnaiger E

Selected quotations

  • Journals have encouraged more complete reporting of methods and results in recent years, but there is still scope for improvement, especially when it comes to making data and code openly available. Many studies would benefit from greater input from experts in statistics, ideally before data are collected, and preregistration should help to reduce bias and increase rigor in certain types of studies. Increased preprinting will also help for most papers by increasing both readership and scrutiny, and by making new results available sooner. Lastly, a greater emphasis on science that is rigorous, as opposed to eye-catching, from researchers, institutions, funders and journals would benefit everyone.

Cited by

Gnaiger 2021 Bioenerg Commun


Gnaiger E (2021) Beyond counting papers – a mission and vision for scientific publication. Bioenerg Commun 2021.5. https://doi:10.26124/BEC:2021-0005 - Living Communication


Labels:






BEC2021.5f 

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.