Baglivo 2022 BEC: Difference between revisions

From Bioblast
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Bioblast2022 banner.jpg|link=Bioblast_2022]]
{{BEC}}
[[File:BEC-exlibris.png|right|290px|Bioenergetics Communications|link=https://www.bioenergetics-communications.org/index.php/bec/index]]
{{Publication
{{Publication
|title=Baglivo E, Cardoso LHD, Cecatto C, Gnaiger E (2022) Statistical analysis of instrumental reproducibility as internal quality control in high-resolution respirometry. Bioenerg Commun 2022.8. https://doi.org/10.26124/bec:2022-0008
|title=Baglivo E, Cardoso LHD, Cecatto C, Gnaiger E (2022) Statistical analysis of instrumental reproducibility as internal quality control in high-resolution respirometry. Bioenerg Commun 2022.8. https://doi.org/10.26124/bec:2022-0008
|info=Bioenerg Commun 2022.08. [[File:OpenAccess-downloadPDF.png|200px||link=https://www.bioenergetics-communications.org/index.php/bec/article/view/baglivo_2022/88 |Open Access pdf]]<br /> ''published online'' 2022-08-04 [[File:WatchThePresentationYoutube_icon.jpg|200px|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNSu-hY3hUg&t=15s|»''Watch the presentation''«]]
|info=Bioenerg Commun 2022.08. [[File:OpenAccess-downloadPDF.png|200px||link=https://www.bioenergetics-communications.org/index.php/bec/article/view/baglivo_2022/88 |Open Access pdf]]<br /> ''published online'' 2022-08-04 [[File:WatchThePresentationYoutube_icon.jpg|200px|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNSu-hY3hUg&t=15s|»''Watch the presentation''«]]<br /><br />
<br /><br />
|authors=Baglivo Eleonora, Cardoso Luiza HD, Cecatto Cristiane, Gnaiger Erich
|authors=Baglivo Eleonora, Cardoso Luiza HD, Cecatto Cristiane, Gnaiger Erich
|year=2022
|year=2022
Line 17: Line 13:
We applied this SOP in a 3-year study using 48 Oroboros O2k chambers. Stability of air and zero O<sub>2</sub> calibration signals was monitored throughout intervals of up to 8 months without sensor service. Maximum drift over 1 to 3 days was 0.06 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup>, without persistence over time since drift was <0.004 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup> for time intervals of one month, corresponding to a drift per day of 0.2 % of the signal at air saturation. Instrumental O<sub>2</sub> background -d''c''<sub>O<sub>2</sub></sub>/d''t'' was stable within ±1 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup> when measured at monthly intervals. These results confirm the instrumental limit of detection of volume-specific O<sub>2</sub> flux at ±1 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup>. The instrumental SOP applied in the present study contributes to the generally applicable internal quality control management ensuring the unique reproducibility in high-resolution respirometry.<br>
We applied this SOP in a 3-year study using 48 Oroboros O2k chambers. Stability of air and zero O<sub>2</sub> calibration signals was monitored throughout intervals of up to 8 months without sensor service. Maximum drift over 1 to 3 days was 0.06 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup>, without persistence over time since drift was <0.004 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup> for time intervals of one month, corresponding to a drift per day of 0.2 % of the signal at air saturation. Instrumental O<sub>2</sub> background -d''c''<sub>O<sub>2</sub></sub>/d''t'' was stable within ±1 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup> when measured at monthly intervals. These results confirm the instrumental limit of detection of volume-specific O<sub>2</sub> flux at ±1 pmol∙s<sup>−1</sup>∙mL<sup>−1</sup>. The instrumental SOP applied in the present study contributes to the generally applicable internal quality control management ensuring the unique reproducibility in high-resolution respirometry.<br>
|keywords=high-resolution respirometry HRR; polarographic oxygen sensor POS; air calibration; instrumental background; reproducibility; limit of detection; internal quality control IQC; standard operating procedure SOP
|keywords=high-resolution respirometry HRR; polarographic oxygen sensor POS; air calibration; instrumental background; reproducibility; limit of detection; internal quality control IQC; standard operating procedure SOP
|editor=Tindle-Solomon L
|editor=Tindle-Solomon L
|mipnetlab=AT Innsbruck Oroboros
|mipnetlab=AT Innsbruck Oroboros
}}
}}
{{Labeling
|area=Respiration, Instruments;methods
|tissues=HEK
|instruments=Oxygraph-2k, TIP2k, O2k-Protocol
|additional=BEC, SUIT-001 O2 ce-pce D003
}}
[[File:Bioblast2022 banner.jpg|link=Bioblast_2022]]
{{BEC}}
[[File:BEC-exlibris.png|right|290px|Bioenergetics Communications|link=https://www.bioenergetics-communications.org/index.php/bec/index]]
ORC'''ID''':[[File:ORCID.png|20px|link= https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5507-9663]] Baglivo Eleonora [[File:ORCID.png|20px|link=https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6392-9229]] Cardoso Luiza HD, [[File:ORCID.png|20px|link=https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7068-6165]] Cecatto Cristiane, [[File:ORCID.png|20px|link=https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-5895]] Gnaiger Erich
ORC'''ID''':[[File:ORCID.png|20px|link= https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5507-9663]] Baglivo Eleonora [[File:ORCID.png|20px|link=https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6392-9229]] Cardoso Luiza HD, [[File:ORCID.png|20px|link=https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7068-6165]] Cecatto Cristiane, [[File:ORCID.png|20px|link=https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-5895]] Gnaiger Erich
__TOC__
__TOC__
Line 31: Line 35:
:::: This work was part of the Oroboros [[NextGen-O2k]] project, with funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement nº 859770.
:::: This work was part of the Oroboros [[NextGen-O2k]] project, with funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement nº 859770.


{{Labeling
 
|area=Respiration, Instruments;methods
|tissues=HEK
|instruments=Oxygraph-2k, O2k-Protocol
|additional=BEC, SUIT-001 O2 ce-pce D003
}}
[[Category:BEC]]
[[Category:BEC]]

Revision as of 04:52, 9 March 2023

Publications in the MiPMap
Baglivo E, Cardoso LHD, Cecatto C, Gnaiger E (2022) Statistical analysis of instrumental reproducibility as internal quality control in high-resolution respirometry. Bioenerg Commun 2022.8. https://doi.org/10.26124/bec:2022-0008

» Bioenerg Commun 2022.08. Open Access pdf
published online 2022-08-04 »Watch the presentation«

Baglivo Eleonora, Cardoso Luiza HD, Cecatto Cristiane, Gnaiger Erich (2022) Bioenerg Commun

Abstract: BEC.png https://doi.org/10.26124/bec:2022-0008

Graphical abstract

Evaluation of instrumental reproducibility is a primary component of quality control to quantify the precision and limit of detection of analytical procedures. A pre-analytical instrumental standard operating procedure (SOP) is implemented in high-resolution respirometry consisting of: (1) a daily SOP-POS for air calibration of the polarographic oxygen sensor (POS) in terms of oxygen concentration cO2 [µM]. This is part of the sensor test to evaluate POS performance; (2) a monthly SOP-BG starting with the SOP-POS followed by the chamber test quantifying the instrumental O2 background. The chamber test focuses on the slope dcO2/dt [pmol∙s−1∙mL−1] to determine O2 consumption by the POS and O2 backdiffusion into the chamber as a function of cO2 in the absence of sample. Finally, zero O2 calibration completes the sensor test.

We applied this SOP in a 3-year study using 48 Oroboros O2k chambers. Stability of air and zero O2 calibration signals was monitored throughout intervals of up to 8 months without sensor service. Maximum drift over 1 to 3 days was 0.06 pmol∙s−1∙mL−1, without persistence over time since drift was <0.004 pmol∙s−1∙mL−1 for time intervals of one month, corresponding to a drift per day of 0.2 % of the signal at air saturation. Instrumental O2 background -dcO2/dt was stable within ±1 pmol∙s−1∙mL−1 when measured at monthly intervals. These results confirm the instrumental limit of detection of volume-specific O2 flux at ±1 pmol∙s−1∙mL−1. The instrumental SOP applied in the present study contributes to the generally applicable internal quality control management ensuring the unique reproducibility in high-resolution respirometry.
Keywords: high-resolution respirometry HRR; polarographic oxygen sensor POS; air calibration; instrumental background; reproducibility; limit of detection; internal quality control IQC; standard operating procedure SOP Bioblast editor: Tindle-Solomon L O2k-Network Lab: AT Innsbruck Oroboros


Labels: MiParea: Respiration, Instruments;methods 


Tissue;cell: HEK 



HRR: Oxygraph-2k, TIP2k, O2k-Protocol 

BEC, SUIT-001 O2 ce-pce D003 

Bioblast2022 banner.jpg


Bioenergetics Communications        
Tributes to pioneers in bioenergetics
       
Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways
       
Gnaiger Erich et al ― MitoEAGLE Task Group (2020) Mitochondrial physiology. Bioenerg Commun 2020.1.
        MitoPedia: BEC         MitoPedia: Gentle Science         MitoFit Preprints
Bioenergetics Communications

ORCID:ORCID.png Baglivo Eleonora ORCID.png Cardoso Luiza HD, ORCID.png Cecatto Cristiane, ORCID.png Gnaiger Erich

Preprint

» Baglivo 2022 MitoFit-QC

Support

This work was part of the Oroboros NextGen-O2k project, with funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement nº 859770.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.